Monday, November 19, 2012

Officers Moving Casualties 
Nick Rotondo's: The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

During the 1910’s New York City was a major producer of the nation’s clothing industry. New York City alone made 70% of the nation’s garments. The major factories that contributed to this were all located in downtown Manhattan. Within close proximity, and similar in function business owners were willing to cut corners. By cutting corners, they created unsafe environments for workers. One of these companies was the Triangle Waist Company. It was located on the northern corner of Washington Sq. and was a nine story building. On March 25, 1911 a fire struck inside of the building. Along with the numerous fire hazards, locked door caused the company to instantaneous go into flames; causing one of the worst disasters since the beginning of the industrial revolution

There were approximately 500 people that made up the working staff at the Triangle Waist Fire. Out of those 500 employees, 146 lost their lives to the fire of 1911. People were trapped inside the building with nowhere to turn. The fire escapes were collapsed, the doors were locked, and the firefighter’s ladders only reached the 6th floor. People had to choose between being encompassed by the fire altogether, or taking a leap of faith. The fire fighters set up nets to catch jumpers. Ultimately, they failed and many more lost their lives. Most of the people who lost their lives were young, Jewish immigrants who came to the United States searching for a better life. Most of them found one similar or even worse.

Blanck and Harris, the owners of the Triangle Waist Company hired a subcontractor who ran the building. It is believed that they had no idea as to what the pay or conditions of their building were. They entrusted in a subcontractor because it meant two things: less stress and more leisure time. The company in turn was full of chaos. In a literal sense The Triangle Waist Company was a “sweatshop”. Women worked in close quarter and long hours only to receive little pay. They were treated less than human and ordered around by their supervisors. One of the reasons the doors inside of the building were locked was to keep workers in line. The business men were afraid that they would be distracted by others and dilly dally in the stair wells. Ultimately, locking the door caused the building to erupt in flames and destroy the building beyond repair.

After the fire, Blanck and Harris were indicted. They faced trial but never received any punishment because the building was approved by the Department of Buildings prior to the fire. Although charges were dropped they faced 23 civil suits and had to pay $75 dollars per life lost. In 1913 Max Blanck was charged with locking the doors again. This time he had to pay $25 dollars and apologize to the people.

The Triangle Waist Fire sparked the nation’s labor movement and improved the rights of the workers. Women workers especially began to be acknowledged for their skill and education. The Factory Investigating Commission (FIC) issued a series of reports to reform the modern labor conditions. NYC legislation also passed 8 new bills. Brue Raynor, President of Workers United said in regards to the fire, “It was an incredibly galvanizing event for the nations labor movement and the rights of workers. After Triangle, people were so shocked, not only by the terrible disaster, but by the drama of these young immigrant women who were treated as less than human by their boss.’






Women Workers
Working Space 

Mourning Their Lost Ones

 Links:

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Faces of America



Recently our class finished watching the first episode of Faces of America. In this video Henry Louis Gates Jr. explores and researches the history of twelve outstanding individuals. A few people seen throughout the video are: Yo-Yo Ma, Eva Longoria, and Meryl Steep. With the help of Henry, these celebrities trace their family history and become enlightened with facts that they never knew. For example, Yo-Yo Ma who know little going into his meeting with Mr. Gates, came out with completely new knowledge about his family lineage. One of his cousins had hidden the Ma family's genealogy tracing back to the year 1217. Watching this particular video made me realize how narrow minded we are as humans. Sometimes we get caught up in dealing with our own agendas and forget where we came from. Its spectacular to think about all the people that came before us in history and in our individual families. If one relationship was altered along my family tree I might not be here right now. In retrospect, this video does a great job of showing how important it is for everyone to learn more about their family lineage. With a little digging, you'll never know what you could find.

America is a country built off of pride, success, and opportunities. As Americans we pride ourselves with being apart of one of the best countries of the world. But how did we get here? How did we become as successful as we are present day? The ones that came before us are accredited with moving along the nation and growing into a success story. Our ancestors, especially immigrant ancestors played a major role in the rise of our nation. They came from all parts of the world with hope and ambition. Many of them had to say goodbye to loved ones, knowing that they'd never be reunited. Others dropped their lives on their cozy farms and moved into industrial parts of the country. They weren't afraid of facing change or starting a new life as long as it would better the lives of their children or next generation. That is why it is important for everyone to take care of our nation now. We have to eliminate debt, build our country up, and vote for whoever we believe will further our nation and preserve it for the ones following us.

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Henry Ford

Henry Ford 
(1863-1947)


      Henry Ford was born on June 30th of 1863 in present-day Dearborn, Michigan. As Henry grew up he turned his focus towards becoming a machinist. At age seventeen began pursuing his career in mechanics. Ford was an apprentice for three years and in 1891 became an engineer of Edison Illuminating Company Ford soon became the Chief Engineer of the E.I.C. and started preforming experiments and creating internal combustion engines. His first success was the Quadricycle, a two-speed fully functioning automobile. From there, Henry went on to create the Ford Motor Company in 1903 and later produced the Model T. By 1918 half of the car on the road were Ford's, showing that his hard work was finally paying off. His goal was to produce "reasonably priced, reliable, and efficient cars" for the public. Today he is known as one of America's leading business men

    I admire Henry Ford for his accomplishments and his strive for success. Although he is a controversial figure  in history I feel like everything he did was to better his company. One thing Ford did involved his social department, they would look into prospective employees actives outside of work. By determining their habits such as drinking or gambling issues Henry was able to weed out those that didn't fit his company. Some people might think this was a drastic way to figure out who was suitable, but I believe Ford was very protective of his company. Afterall, he spent many years building his company up and didn't want to risk all of his hard work. As far as employees went, Ford wanted serious, focused individuals that would better his company. 

links:  
http://www.biography.com/people/henry-ford-9298747
     

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Fritz Scholder

Fritz Scholder:  Insulting Expressionist or Artistic Genius?


http://www.achievement.org
/autodoc/photocredit/achievers
/sch1-011
http://bloximages.chicago2.
vip.townnews.com/taosnews.com
/content/tncms/assets/
v3/editorial/b/79/b793996b-b4ad-5e77-a

3a8-3d91e250f9a7/
4e5d013f1a87d.preview-300.jpg
Fritz Scholder is a very controversial figure in relation to Native American art. Many people think his five decades dedicated to creating paintings, sculptures, prints, and photography were meaningful and respectable, while other believe him to be completely crazy. In the last few days I have analyzed this subject thoroughly. 




I started off by learning a little bit about his background and family life. Born and raised in Breckenridge, Minnesota, Fritz grew up in a stable family with several siblings. Although he was one-fourth Luiseno (grandmother was fully Native American), he was raised as if he were completely white. His father decided his children would have better opportunities and be seen differently if they assimilated with the whites. In a quote from the National Museum of the American Indian, Fritz states, "My father learned to be ashamed of his heritage when he attended Indian Schools and accepted without 'ranco' to live as white. That is what he wanted for his children and that is why he sent us to white schools." Fritz does not consider himself to be Native American, and yet he is known for being the "leader of the New American Art Movement"

There are a range of different opinions towards Fritz Scholder, but I want to turn your focus toward two. The first being that he is an Insulting Expressionist. From the get-go of my research, I saw Scholder as a confusing human being. On one hand he paints beautiful scenes that can't help but be applauded, but then he says things like, "I've never had any fear about the work, simply because I give thanks every day that I've been able to take my craziness and make it work for me. And I'm completely crazy. I'm so intense that I am out, all the time, somewhere else. And I had to learn to communicate, to act calm because if I couldn't paint, I would be on the streets shooting people." How can one read that quote and think of him as a successful and renowned painter? As Frtiz Scholder aged, he had major medical problems such as Scoliosis and Diabetes and became even mentally unstable. In his painting Blood Skull No. 1 he used his own blood as part of his medium!(see below) Scholder has an odd perspective on his heritage. He believes that " ...man's excellence is equal to his most tragic flaw". This shows that although he doesn't like being associated with his Indian heritage, It will always be a part of him and what ultimately made him famous.

Frtiz Scholder's Blood Skull No. 1
2001
http://nmai.si.edu/exhibitions/scholder/works.html 
The second approach towards Scholder, is simply that he is an artistic genius. In an article I read, written by Jenna Sant she states that Fritz attempts to, "Deconstruct more than a century of romantic images of Native Americans and approach the American Indian in real terms." After reading the above quotation, I was reminded of the "natural man" or the American cowboy. Cowboys post Civil War, were romanticized and made out to be violent, free spirited men that were in touch with nature. In reality, they were low paid cow herders that lived lifes of discomfort and loneliness. I had a new sense of understanding for Fritz Scholder by the end of her article. It was obvious that he was not trying to offend Native Americans, but rather make others to see them for what they were, just ordinary people. He wanted to express his observations and rule out the idea that Indians were mythic creatures. Scholder did so by paint pictures such as Super Indian No. 2 and Indian With Beer. (see below) By including items such as ice cream and beer, Fritz provides context clues for readers. Scholder wants his audience to come to the conclusion that Indians share similar qualities to whites and express his idiom "Real, not Red".
Super Indian No. 2
http://nmai.si.edu/exhibitions
/scholder/works.html
Indian With Beer
 http://www.achievement.org/autodoc
/photocredit/achievers/sch1-008 
In conclusion, Fritz Scholder may seem like a disrespectful and offensive artist, but with a little research it is obvious that he meant no harm. If anything, he used his bright colors and modern style to help transform and inspire a new perspective on Native Americans. Scholder has been acknowledged for his efforts and received honors from the Ford, Rockefeller, and Whitney Foundations. All in all he was a great artist with a very unique and distinguished style.  

Indian in Canoe
http://www.achievement.org
/autodoc/photocredit/achievers/sch1-020
Indian No. 1
1967
http://nmai.si.edu/exhibitions/scholder/works.html
Indian with Flag




Resources: